Prepare gh-pages #131
Prepare gh-pages #131
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files, primarily focusing on the GitHub Actions workflow for documentation generation, updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/gh-pages.yaml (2)
Line range hint
17-28: LGTM: Documentation generation steps are well-structured.The steps for setting up the environment and generating documentation are appropriate. Clearing the docs directory before generation ensures a clean slate, which is a good practice.
Suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a step to cache Node.js dependencies to speed up future workflow runs. You can use theactions/cacheaction for this purpose.Example:
- name: Cache dependencies uses: actions/cache@v3 with: path: ~/.npm key: ${{ runner.OS }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }} restore-keys: | ${{ runner.OS }}-node-🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
15-15: label "self-hosted-hoprnet-small" is unknown. available labels are "windows-latest", "windows-latest-8-cores", "windows-2022", "windows-2019", "ubuntu-latest", "ubuntu-latest-4-cores", "ubuntu-latest-8-cores", "ubuntu-latest-16-cores", "ubuntu-24.04", "ubuntu-22.04", "ubuntu-20.04", "macos-latest", "macos-latest-xl", "macos-latest-xlarge", "macos-latest-large", "macos-14-xl", "macos-14-xlarge", "macos-14-large", "macos-14", "macos-14.0", "macos-13-xl", "macos-13-xlarge", "macos-13-large", "macos-13", "macos-13.0", "macos-12-xl", "macos-12-xlarge", "macos-12-large", "macos-12", "macos-12.0", "macos-11", "macos-11.0", "self-hosted", "x64", "arm", "arm64", "linux", "macos", "windows". if it is a custom label for self-hosted runner, set list of labels in actionlint.yaml config file
(runner-label)
Line range hint
30-35: LGTM: GitHub Pages deployment configuration is appropriate.The deployment step is well-configured for a documentation site. Using
force_orphan: trueensures a clean history on the gh-pages branch, which is good practice for documentation deployments.Suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a step to output the URL of the deployed documentation site for easy access. You can use theactions/github-scriptaction for this:- name: Output documentation URL uses: actions/github-script@v6 with: script: | const repoName = context.repo.repo; const ownerName = context.repo.owner; console.log(`Documentation deployed to: https://${ownerName}.github.io/${repoName}/`);This will provide a direct link to the newly deployed documentation in the workflow logs.
README.md (1)
Line range hint
1-121: Suggestions for further README enhancementsThe README is already comprehensive and well-structured. However, consider the following suggestions to further improve its usability:
- Add a table of contents at the beginning of the README to enhance navigation, especially as the document grows.
- Include a "Contributing" section to encourage community involvement and provide guidelines for potential contributors.
These additions could make the README even more user-friendly and foster community engagement.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
- .github/workflows/gh-pages.yaml (2 hunks)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- docs/.nojekyll (0 hunks)
- docs/README.md (0 hunks)
- docs/classes/HoprSDK.md (0 hunks)
- docs/classes/utils.sdkApiError.md (0 hunks)
- docs/modules.md (0 hunks)
- docs/modules/api.md (0 hunks)
- docs/modules/flows.md (0 hunks)
- docs/modules/utils.md (0 hunks)
- docs/modules/web3.md (0 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (9)
- docs/.nojekyll
- docs/README.md
- docs/classes/HoprSDK.md
- docs/classes/utils.sdkApiError.md
- docs/modules.md
- docs/modules/api.md
- docs/modules/flows.md
- docs/modules/utils.md
- docs/modules/web3.md
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.gitignore (1)
61-61: Clarify the rationale for ignoring the entiredocs/directoryThe addition of
docs/to the .gitignore file means that the entire docs directory and its contents will be ignored by Git. While this could be intentional if the documentation is being generated automatically or hosted separately (e.g., on GitHub Pages), it's unusual to completely ignore documentation in a repository, especially for an SDK.Could you please clarify:
- The reasoning behind this change?
- How will the documentation be managed and version-controlled?
- Is this related to the new GitHub Pages workflow mentioned in the PR description?
If the intention is to ignore only specific files within the docs directory, consider using more specific patterns instead. For example:
docs/*.html docs/_site/This would allow you to keep important source files (like Markdown) in version control while ignoring generated files.
To help understand the current state of the docs directory, let's check its contents:
.github/workflows/gh-pages.yaml (2)
Line range hint
1-10: LGTM: Workflow configuration looks good.The changes to the workflow name, trigger, and concurrency settings are appropriate for a documentation generation workflow. Limiting the trigger to pushes to the main branch ensures that documentation is only updated when changes are merged, which is a good practice.
13-15: Consider the implications of using a self-hosted runner.The job configuration looks good, with the name accurately reflecting its purpose. However, using a self-hosted runner (hoprnet-small) has important implications:
- Security: Ensure the runner is properly secured to prevent potential security risks.
- Maintenance: Self-hosted runners require regular maintenance and updates.
- Availability: Make sure the runner is consistently available to prevent workflow interruptions.
Please confirm that these aspects have been considered and addressed.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
15-15: label "self-hosted-hoprnet-small" is unknown. available labels are "windows-latest", "windows-latest-8-cores", "windows-2022", "windows-2019", "ubuntu-latest", "ubuntu-latest-4-cores", "ubuntu-latest-8-cores", "ubuntu-latest-16-cores", "ubuntu-24.04", "ubuntu-22.04", "ubuntu-20.04", "macos-latest", "macos-latest-xl", "macos-latest-xlarge", "macos-latest-large", "macos-14-xl", "macos-14-xlarge", "macos-14-large", "macos-14", "macos-14.0", "macos-13-xl", "macos-13-xlarge", "macos-13-large", "macos-13", "macos-13.0", "macos-12-xl", "macos-12-xlarge", "macos-12-large", "macos-12", "macos-12.0", "macos-11", "macos-11.0", "self-hosted", "x64", "arm", "arm64", "linux", "macos", "windows". if it is a custom label for self-hosted runner, set list of labels in actionlint.yaml config file
(runner-label)
package.json (1)
42-42: Simplified documentation generation scriptThe
docsscript has been modified to remove thetypedoc-plugin-markdownplugin and the--hideBreadcrumbsoption. This change aligns with the PR objective of preparing for GitHub Pages.Potential impacts:
- Removing
typedoc-plugin-markdownmight affect the format of generated documentation. Ensure that this doesn't negatively impact the documentation output for GitHub Pages.- Removing
--hideBreadcrumbswill show breadcrumbs in the generated documentation, potentially improving navigation.To ensure the documentation still generates correctly and the removed plugin isn't used elsewhere, run the following script:
README.md (2)
117-121: Excellent update to documentation links!The transition from GitHub repository links to GitHub Pages links is a significant improvement. This change enhances documentation accessibility and follows best practices for hosting project documentation. The new links are correctly formatted and consistent across all sections.
Line range hint
1-121: README content is comprehensive and well-structuredThe README provides clear and detailed information about the @hoprnet/hopr-sdk package. It covers installation, usage, documentation links, project setup, and deployment process effectively. The content is well-organized and easy to follow, making it a valuable resource for both users and developers.
I had to merge #130 to start developing this new workflow, that's why the changes are so few, because I started the development of this workflow in the previous PR
Summary by CodeRabbit
package.json.